File #: 20-0192    Version: 1 Name: Centerpoint 2020 GRIP Application
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 4/23/2020 In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/28/2020 Final action: 4/28/2020
Title: Consider and take action on a resolution responding to the application of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., Texas Coast Division, to increase rates under the Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program; suspending the effective date of this rate application for forty-five days; authorizing the City to continue to participate in a coalition of cities known as the "Texas Coast Utilities Coalition" of cities (City Attorney)
Attachments: 1. Data Sheet, 2. Proposed Resolution
Title
Consider and take action on a resolution responding to the application of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., Texas Coast Division, to increase rates under the Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program; suspending the effective date of this rate application for forty-five days; authorizing the City to continue to participate in a coalition of cities known as the "Texas Coast Utilities Coalition" of cities (City Attorney)

Background:

ALLIANCE OF CENTERPOINT MUNICIPALITIES

The City is a member of the Texas Coast Utilities Coalition (“TCUC”) of cities. TCUC was organized by a number of municipalities served by CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., Texas Coast Division (“CenterPoint”) and has been represented by the law firm of Herrera Law & Associates, PLLC (through Mr. Alfred R. Herrera) to assist in reviewing applications to change rates submitted by CenterPoint.

“GRIP” RATE APPLICATION

Under section 104.301 of the Gas Utility Regulatory Act (“GURA”), a gas utility is allowed to request increases in its rates to recover a return on investments it makes between rate cases. This section of GURA is commonly referred to as the “GRIP” statute, that is, the “Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program.”

Under a decision by the Supreme Court of Texas, the Court concluded that a filing made under the GRIP statute permitted gas utilities the opportunity to recover return on capital expenditures made during the interim period between rate cases by applying for interim rate adjustment and that proceedings under the GRIP statute did not contemplate either adjudicative hearings or substantive review of utilities' filings for interim rate adjustments. Instead, the Court concluded, the GRIP statute provides for a ministerial review of the utility’s filings to ensure compliance with the GRIP statute and the Railroad Commission’s rules, and that it is within the Railroad Commission’s authority to preclude cities from intervening and obtaining a hearing before the Railroad Co...

Click here for full text